Hotels: The world’s most expensive hotels – would you work 943 days for one night here?

While the travel world is currently on pause, that doesn’t mean you can’t plan and dream about your next holiday. With breath-taking views, lavish suites, A-list guests and 24-hour butlers, these hotels are worth their eye-watering price tags. So, how long would you have to work to be able to stay for a single night?

READ MORE

  • New trick to get luxury five star hotel experience revealed

Official-canada-eta.com, ESTA Visa Waiver processors, have analysed data on the most expensive hotel suites and standard rooms at top hotels in the world.

The results revealed the cost of staying at an expensive suite in a top-notch hotel compared with the average UK salary and how that compares with a standard room at the same hotel.

Palms Casino Resort, Las Vegas

This hotel costs £78,433 per night which is 943 days of the average person’s salary in the UK.

The Empathy Suite includes commissioned artwork, two sharks suspended in liquid, an outdoor pool and a 13-seater bar overlooking the Las Vegas strip.

The added extras include butlers, a chauffeured car, and $10,000 (£7,840) to spend around the resort.

But a standard room at the same hotel costs just £153 a night which is two days of work on the average UK salary.

Hotel President Wilson, Lake Geneva, Switzerland

With guests like Rihanna, Matt Damon and Céline Dion, this hotel has the largest and most expensive suite in Europe.

At £66,800 a night, it would take 803 days of work on the typical UK salary to rent the suite.

DON’T MISS
Hotels: Staff reveal they know this secret about guests [INSIGHT]
Investigation reveals hotel rooms cheaper if holidaymakers do this [UPDATE]
Coronavirus hits Abu Dhabi: 2 hotels put on lockdown [ANALYSIS]

However, the suite includes Stunning views of the lake, one of the world’s largest TV screens, a grand piano and a wrap around terrace.

The property is over 5,500 foot and includes bullet-proof windows.

The cost of a standard room is £518 a night which is six days of work.

Or, you can find 23 guests to take with you and share a 12-bed suite which will only set you back £2,800 per person.

BVLGARI Resort and Residences, Dubai

This hotel has created a private island with a bridge that connects you to mainland Dubai.

It costs £33,573 per night or over 400 days’ work which gets you a Turkish Spa, a private beach, home cinema and private security.

The stunning hotel oozes sophistication, comfort and security – what more could you want?

But if that’s a little out of your price range, you can stay in one of the hotel’s standard rooms which costs a reasonable £368 for just four days’ work.

Jayne Forrester, Director of International Development at Official-canada-eta.com said of the data: “The luxuries these hotel rooms provide really make them a once in a lifetime experience for the typical person.

“With lavish celebrity lifestyles shared across social media, you do wonder how much some evenings cost. Comparing these hotel room prices to salaries is really interesting, and can help you appreciate great deals on your holidays and accommodation.

“While most people could only afford one of these suites with a lottery win, they represent the luxury hotspots that you may still be able to experience at a lower price point.

“Split between several people for special occasions, these hotel experiences could be more within reach than they first appear.”

Source: Read Full Article

Coronavirus: How covid-19 will change the future of travel

Covid-19 has left a lot of people wondering whether they will ever take a holiday again. With cruise lines suspending their schedules and airlines cancelling flights most days, many people have put their holiday plans on hold. While the Government is hoping for the coronavirus, and therefore lockdown, to be over in a matter of months, the likelihood of that is getting slimmer each day.

READ MORE

  • Royal travel: The bizarre travel rule that all Royal heirs must follow

Today, the UK experienced its highest rise in deaths in a single day, taking the death toll to 2,352.

With cases and death tolls rising all over the world, and travel companies seeking financial help, what does the future of the travel industry look like?

Less everyday travel

If remote collaboration and communication has proven to be more effective then people won’t travel as much.

The long-term impacts on businesses cannot be predicted but if isolation has led to more effective work and is better for the environment, then it is possible that people will continue working at home and travel less.

Simon Hayes of NEC Display Solutions Europe said that remote collaboration and communication cuts back travel time by 25 percent on average.

He said in AV Magazine’s blog: “Some people may still travel to the office but realise it need not be every day.

“Others, living further away perhaps, will be able to connect without wasting hours of travel time and its associated risks and frustrations.

“Imagine a Monday morning without the gridlock because 25 percent of regular commuters have chosen to connect remotely for the 9am briefing.”

He added that a one-hour meeting in the office can take 15 minutes less time by using video.

DON’T MISS
Flights: Why are planes still flying despite the coronavirus lockdown? [UPDATE]
WATCH: Heartwarming moment Virgin staff dance for final flight [INSIGHT]
Flight warning: Airline tickets could be given tobacco-style warning [ANALYSIS]

He added: “Time is precious, so let’s hope people reward themselves more often by claiming some of it for themselves. It will certainly make for a happier workforce so let’s embrace that.”

Less international travel

A key analysts has lowered Expedia’s profitability estimates again as people wonder whether travel companies in the future will have a business at all.

On Monday, RBC Capital Markets lowered Expedia’s profitability, estimating that they will incur a $57million (£45.8million) loss.

Last year, in the same quarter, they made a profit of $176million (£141.6million).

The analysts wrote: “We continue to believe EXPE is one of the most at-risk names in terms of exposure to COVID-19 and view the extent and duration of this risk as an unknowable.”

Egencia President Rob Greyber, whose corporate travel company is owned by Expedia Group said he is optimistic.

He said: “I think what’s driven business travel is going to still be true as we emerge from this, but I don’t think it’s going to be a dramatic recovery overnight. But I do think travel recovers within a pretty close range of where it’s been. And I think it will continue to grow from there.”

The World Travel and Tourism Council projects that up to 75million travel and tourism jobs are at risk due to coronavirus.

The US Travel Association and Tourism Economics estimates a loss of 5.9million travel-related jobs in America by the end of April.

Microsoft’s global director of travel Eric Bailey said he thinks the way the travel sector works will shift after coronavirus.

He said: “It doesn’t mean that people stop travelling, necessarily, but it does mean that they they change the way that they travel. They don’t necessarily need to be face to face for a lot of things.”

He added: “I don’t think it’s going be about the dollars — it’s about the time.”

More holidays

However, others are more positive and think that the public will book more holidays.

A spokesman from ABTA, a travel association told Express.co.uk: “The coronavirus pandemic has placed the travel industry under immense financial and practical strain.

“The Great British public love their holidays and once we get back to normal there will be pent up demand for a much deserved break.

“It is essential that the government does everything in its power to support the travel industry to ensure businesses make it through to cater for this demand.

“This support will also safeguard the jobs of tens of thousands of workers and their families who depend on them.”

Source: Read Full Article

Cruises: Voyages to Guernsey cancelled until May as island records first covid-19 death

It comes as last week, all cruise ships to Guernsey had been cancelled until the end of April at the earliest due to the latest coronavirus travel measures. But now the cancellations have been extended until May 11.

READ MORE

  • Cruises: Cunard sells cruise tickets to Australia – here’s why

All cruise liners scheduled to visit the island in April were cancelled in mid March.

However, the States have now announced further cancellations due to the uncertainty of the lockdown.

BACK BRITAIN’S BRAVE NHS HEROES – CLICK HERE NOW

This means that several are cruise ships will no longer be able to dock in Guernsey because of the deadly virus.

The first cruise ship of the season was the Fridtjof Nansen which was meant to have arrived on March 20.

It was cancelled earlier in the month following the advice from Guernsey’s Public Health.

The decision was then made to stop all cruise ships to the island for the whole of April.

The largest vessel set to visit in April was the P&O Britannia which was chatting more than 4,000 people.

But P&O also lengthened the suspension of operations due to the coronavirus pandemic this week.

DON’T MISS
Student doctor terrified for grandparents, 90 and 75 on cruise ship [INSIGHT]
Coronavirus: Australia sets up covid-19 hotels for new arrivals [UPDATE]
Falklands panic: Islanders in isolation over coronavirus outbreak fear [ANALYSIS]

President of the company Paul Ludlow said in a statement that it was “not feasible” to return to sailing at this moment in time.

The largest marina facility in the British Isles, Guernsey Harbours said in a previous statement: “Due to the global outbreak of Covid-19, travel restrictions imposed by the States of Guernsey require all persons arriving in the Bailiwick from anywhere else in the world to self-isolate for 14 days on arrival.”

Guernsey Harbours has been contacted for further comment.

The island expects that all persons arriving in Guernsey from anywhere in the world must isolate for 14 days on arrival.

This is now a legal requirement that has been imposed by Guernsey’s Medical Officer of Health.

The measures include all travel by any means including private vessels and includes travel between the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey.

Travel advice for the Bailiwick includes, like the UK, no non-essential travel.

An individual planning to leave the island for essential reasons must take into account the fact they will have to self-isolate on their return.

It comes as Guernsey witnessed its first death from the coronavirus this week as the deadly disease spreads across the Channel Islands.

An individual who was known to be 80 years old passed away from covid-19 at the Princess Elizabeth Hospital on March 30.

Guernsey’s Director of Public Health Nicola Brink said in a statement: “I offer my sincere condolences to their family and friends and ask that their privacy is respected at this extremely sad time.”

Three patients at a nursing home in Guernsey have also been confirmed as having coronavirus.

The first death in the Channel Islands was in Jersey on March 25.

Source: Read Full Article

Google Maps: Is this proof of the afterlife? Street view captures line of spooky vehicles

Google Maps Street view is often used by people who wish to take a glimpse of the world from their own homes. It’s especially useful for those who can’t go abroad and want to look at some of the world’s most famous landmarks. However, sometimes Street View is used by eagle-eyed users hoping to spot something hilarious or creepy to share with the world in the hopes it will go viral.

READ MORE

  • Google Maps: Man caught with very bizarre object on the street

Some users often spot people pulling hilarious gestures or carrying bizarre objects.

Google’s massive camera lens captures both the weird and the wonderful.

And in fact, the most unusual scenes often do go viral.

This may be the case for one strange scene which was spotted by a Reddit user recently.

If you have ever needed proof that the afterlife exists, this may be the proof that you need.

The eagle-eyed user posted the photo with a haunting caption which said: “A line of ghost cars.”

And that it what appears to be in the photo – a line of ghostly cars blurring into one.

The first car appears to be red with another burgundy car floating on top of it.

DON’T MISS
Google Maps update will make finding its best feature much easier [UPDATE]
Google Maps: Camera catches man in private moment [INSIGHT]
Google Maps’ new update is designed to help battle COVID-19 outbreak [ANALYSIS]

The other cars further down the line are white and seem to blur into one.

Further down the line there are black cars that almost look like one big long car.

Is it proof that the afterlife exists or just a glitch from the Google Street View camera?

While it would be spooky if this was proof that the afterlife did exist, it is more likely that the Google lens managed to blur the cars together so they almost look like a ghost train.

It could be that the Google Street View car was stuck in traffic and ended up blurring all the cars together as they moved.

There aren’t any people in the photo except for a person wearing a red top in the distance.

The scene shows a sunny summer day with blue skies and white clouds.

The bizarre image was taken outside a hairdressers in Prague, the Czech Republic.

It comes as one man was spotted holding a very strange object in California recently.

The object was as large as the man holding it and looks heavy even though he is holding it with one hand.

The man was seen carrying a giant spatula that was far too big for being used for cooking.

He is also with a friend who is wearing shorts and a t-shirt who is also carrying a huge stuffed dog that looks a bit like a bulldog.

Source: Read Full Article

British Airways flights: BA grounds all flights from Gatwick Airport amid coronavirus

British Airways made the announcement to staff on Monday via email with the airline’s Gatwick managing director Adam Carson telling workers they can “expect to hear more soon” about potential job losses. Mr Carson said: “Due to the considerable restrictions and challenging market environment, like many other airlines, we will temporarily suspend our flying schedule at Gatwick. “I know you will have concerns and questions about what this means for you.

READ MORE

  • Easyjet emergency as THREE flights declare mid-air alerts over Gatwick

“I appreciate there is a desire for more detail about jobs and you should expect to hear more soon.”

A British Airways spokesperson said in a statement: “Due to the considerable restrictions and challenging market environment, like many other airlines, we will temporarily suspend our flying schedule at Gatwick.

BACK BRITAIN’S BRAVE NHS HEROES – CLICK HERE NOW

“We are contacting affected customers to discuss their options.”

However, the airline will still be carrying out essential functions such as maintenance, towing and cleaning to support the airfield and be ready for an efficient start up.  

It comes after easyJet decided to ground its fleet yesterday in a move to save the airline from financial strain.

Ryanair also decided to cut down 80 percent of their flights to help halt the spread of coronavirus.

The move has also seen BA move all of its London flights to Heathrow Airport Terminal 5.

The airline announced on Twitter that they would be pulling out of Terminal 3 of the airport over the weekend.

They posted on Twitter: “We are temporarily moving all of our flights at Heathrow Terminal 3 to Terminal 5 from Sunday.

“If your flight is affected, we will be in contact by email to make sure you are kept up to date.”

DON’T MISS
British Airways, easyJet and Virgin to fly stranded Brits abroad [INSIGHT]
Coronavirus flights: easyJet and BA remove online refund option [UPDATE]

British Airways reduce inflight service amid coronavirus [ANALYSIS]

However, customers were not happy with BA’s announcement, accusing them of allegedly not responding to messages.

One customer replied: “How about replying to your customers phone calls, twits and emails? Will that happen anytime soon?”

Another said: “It’s nice to see replying to everyone here but you haven’t bothered to reply to the two messages I sent asking for help.

“Pretty sure all I need is a link to submit details and you can’t even be bothered to do that.”

Others questioned how the airline was still saying flights were running despite travel restrictions.

One user said: “I can’t even work out why flights are even allowed in or out of the country!

“What’s the point in a lockdown when you keep letting fresh people in the country and potentially contaminated people leave the country?”

BA responded saying, “We’re still operating rescue and repatriation flights to help people return home. Everyone entering a new country has to follow FCO and WHO guidelines on self isolation and quarantine.”

The remaining terminal 3 routes at Heathrow will now take off from terminal 5 where there is more room due to reductions to the schedule.

BA flights from Gatwick were already being pared back.

Jersey Airport also advised that “due to the current situation BA Jersey/Gatwick services will be suspended as from Tuesday 31 March until end of April.”

Virgin Atlantic have also moved all their London flights to Heathrow.

Gatwick Airport will close its North Terminal from tomorrow and then move its existing flights to the South Terminal.

Last week, London City airport decided to close until the end of April earliest after BA decided to suspend its services there.

Gatwick Airport has been contacted for comment.

Source: Read Full Article

Ryanair ‘change fares’ skyrocket as customers rush to re-book summer holidays

Ryanair have claimed that their usual rebooking fee has been waived. However, now customers are having to pay the fare difference for their summer flights which in some cases is significantly higher. In some cases, the change fare is even higher than a brand new ticket on the same flight. Some passengers have noted a difference in fares from £10 to around £80.

READ MORE

  • Coronavirus flights: Expert warns what stranded Britons must do

Disgruntled Ryanair customers have taken to Twitter to air their grievances over the hiked up costs.

One user said: “Trying to change my flight but a ‘fare difference’.

“Online the flights cost €102 but through manage booking its €121.98 why is it an extra €19.98 for the same flights?

“‘No fee’ but you’re charging people more for the same flight when changing.”

Another said: “While @Ryanair have waived flight change admin fees, can you question why the flight fare is significantly higher when selecting new dates than it is to book a new flight for the same dates?”

This Twitter user provided screenshots showing that if they rebooked the 3.20pm flight from Knock to Liverpool on November 12, it would cost €70.99 (£64.58).

However, they then checked the Ryanair website for the price of a brand new ticket on the same plane and it cost €39.99 (£36.38).

Another Twitter user called Martina had a similar problem.

DON’T MISS
Coronavirus flights: Expert warns what stranded Britons must do [UPDATE]
Coronavirus holidays: Britons could lose thousands over axed trips [INSIGHT]
Coronavirus: All cruise ships to Guernsey cancelled [ANALYSIS]

“@Ryanair Hi. Received an email saying I can move my April flight to Malaga free of charge but a difference in the fare cost may apply.

“To change to the same scheduled flight from April to September is costing an extra €192 for two passengers. What a rip off,” she said.

Express.co.uk have contacted Ryanair for comment on these findings.

Ryanair is not allowing customers to cancel flights but is advising customers to rebook at a later date.

READ MORE

  • Coronavirus crisis could deal a ‘fatal’ blow to EU

Their website says that Ryanair flights are “changeable” but they cannot be cancelled.

“If you do not travel on your booked flight the air fare, fees and charges are non-refundable but you may apply within one month of the date of travel for a refund of the Government Tax paid using this link.”

However, Ryanair is offering a refund for flights if they are cancelled.

It comes as Ryanair said they are planning on grounding most of their flights for at least two months from yesterday due to the coronavirus.

The company’s boss Michael O’Leary said that they do not expect to operate flights in April and May.

He said: “We do not expect to operate flights during the months of April and May at this time, but this will clearly depend upon Government advice, and we will in all cases comply with these instructions.”

Mr O’Leary has also said he will be taking a 50 percent pay cut along with other airline employees.

The pay cut will also be for April and May, with the airline re-assessing the situation at the end of it.

Source: Read Full Article